AvocadoScore

AvocadoScore vs WAVE

WAVE goes deep on one page. We go wide across your site.

WAVE (WebAIM) is the long-standing free accessibility evaluator — one page, deep WCAG analysis, visual overlays. AvocadoScore takes the accessibility findings Lighthouse surfaces (which WAVE also catches) and pairs them with Core Web Vitals, SEO readiness, and AI-agent visibility — in one site-wide report instead of one page at a time.

Free 3-page preview  ·  No signup  ·  7-day money-back on paid scans

Feature-by-feature

CapabilityWAVEAvocadoScore
WCAG-A / AA accessibility checks
Visual overlay on the rendered page
Site-wide scan (up to 100 pages)
Core Web Vitals + SEO scorecards
AI Readiness — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, llms.txt
Plain-English fix list w/ effort estimates
Shareable, printable report URL
Export to Jira / Linear
Free to run

If you're doing dedicated accessibility QA, WAVE's per-page deep dive is genuinely better. If you're a web/SEO lead who needs accessibility covered alongside performance, SEO, and AI visibility in one audit you can forward to engineering — AvocadoScore is the report.

What WAVE can't tell you

The three findings every AvocadoScore report surfaces that other tools physically can't — because they audit one side of the visibility equation.

Whether GPTBot can read your site

We fetch your homepage twice — once as a browser, once as GPTBot — and compare. Big content drops mean LLMs see a stripped page; CDN bot-detection is the usual culprit.

Whether your llms.txt is actually useful

Presence isn't quality. We validate that your llms.txt has a heading, link count, and sections — the things that make it a real content map for answer engines, not a tickbox file.

Which one fix is the quick win

We rank recommendations by severity × effort and call out true quick wins. You leave with three things to ship Monday, not 47 findings to sort.

Try it on your site — free

60 seconds, no signup. See exactly what you'd get.

See pricing →  ·  How we measure