AvocadoScore vs Ahrefs Site Audit
Ahrefs scores you for Google. We score you for Google and AI.
Ahrefs Site Audit is the SEO industry standard — deep crawling, backlinks, keyword data. It's also a $129+/month subscription with a steep learning curve. AvocadoScore is a focused one-time audit that covers the SEO basics that move scores plus the AI-readiness layer Ahrefs doesn't touch yet.
Free 3-page preview · No signup · 7-day money-back on paid scans
Feature-by-feature
| Capability | Ahrefs Site Audit | AvocadoScore |
|---|---|---|
| Site-wide SEO scan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Core Web Vitals (real + lab) | ✓ | |
| AI Readiness — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, llms.txt | ✓ | |
| Per-page deep dive with LCP element + weight | ✓ | |
| Plain-English fix list w/ effort estimates | ✓ | |
| Backlinks + keyword data | ✓ | |
| Competitor analysis | ✓ | |
| One-time pricing (no subscription) | ✓ | |
| Shareable, printable report URL | ✓ | |
| Export to Jira / Linear | ✓ |
If you live in SEO every day, you probably need Ahrefs too — it's better at backlinks and keyword research. But for the audit-and-fix workflow, especially with the AI angle, AvocadoScore costs $29 once instead of $129/month forever.
What Ahrefs Site Audit can't tell you
The three findings every AvocadoScore report surfaces that other tools physically can't — because they audit one side of the visibility equation.
Whether GPTBot can read your site
We fetch your homepage twice — once as a browser, once as GPTBot — and compare. Big content drops mean LLMs see a stripped page; CDN bot-detection is the usual culprit.
Whether your llms.txt is actually useful
Presence isn't quality. We validate that your llms.txt has a heading, link count, and sections — the things that make it a real content map for answer engines, not a tickbox file.
Which one fix is the quick win
We rank recommendations by severity × effort and call out true quick wins. You leave with three things to ship Monday, not 47 findings to sort.
Try it on your site — free
60 seconds, no signup. See exactly what you'd get.