AvocadoScore vs Sitebulb
Sitebulb is for SEO programs. We're for the next sprint.
Sitebulb is the visual-first technical SEO crawler — beautiful interactive reports, deep technical analysis, desktop or cloud-based licence. AvocadoScore runs the SEO basics that move scores plus Core Web Vitals and the AI-readiness layer Sitebulb doesn't audit yet — in one shareable cloud report at one-time pricing.
Free 3-page preview · No signup · 7-day money-back on paid scans
Feature-by-feature
| Capability | Sitebulb | AvocadoScore |
|---|---|---|
| Site-wide technical SEO crawl | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interactive visualisations | ✓ | |
| Core Web Vitals (lab + field) | ✓ | |
| AI Readiness — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, llms.txt | ✓ | |
| Per-page deep dive page | ✓ | |
| Plain-English fix list w/ effort estimates | ✓ | |
| Shareable URL for stakeholders | ✓ | |
| One-time pricing (no subscription) | ✓ | |
| Export to Jira / Linear / CSV | ✓ |
Sitebulb earns its place when SEO is an ongoing programme and the team navigates interactive crawl reports every week. AvocadoScore earns its place when the audit needs to land in an engineering ticket queue by Monday — performance, SEO, AI readiness, $29, done.
What Sitebulb can't tell you
The three findings every AvocadoScore report surfaces that other tools physically can't — because they audit one side of the visibility equation.
Whether GPTBot can read your site
We fetch your homepage twice — once as a browser, once as GPTBot — and compare. Big content drops mean LLMs see a stripped page; CDN bot-detection is the usual culprit.
Whether your llms.txt is actually useful
Presence isn't quality. We validate that your llms.txt has a heading, link count, and sections — the things that make it a real content map for answer engines, not a tickbox file.
Which one fix is the quick win
We rank recommendations by severity × effort and call out true quick wins. You leave with three things to ship Monday, not 47 findings to sort.
Try it on your site — free
60 seconds, no signup. See exactly what you'd get.