AvocadoScore vs axe DevTools
axe is the engine. We're the audit on top of it.
axe DevTools is Deque's developer-grade accessibility engine — runs locally in DevTools, in CI, or as part of their paid axe Monitor crawler. AvocadoScore audits the same WCAG-A/AA basics via the Lighthouse engine, then bundles Core Web Vitals, SEO readiness, and AI-agent visibility into one shareable site-wide report.
Free 3-page preview · No signup · 7-day money-back on paid scans
Feature-by-feature
| Capability | axe DevTools | AvocadoScore |
|---|---|---|
| WCAG-A / AA accessibility checks | ✓ | ✓ |
| CI / DevTools integration | ✓ | |
| Site-wide scan in one click | ✓ | |
| Core Web Vitals + lab + field data | ✓ | |
| 12-point SEO scorecard | ✓ | |
| AI Readiness — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, llms.txt | ✓ | |
| Plain-English fix list w/ effort estimates | ✓ | |
| Shareable, printable report URL | ✓ | |
| One-time pricing (no subscription) | ✓ |
If your engineering team needs axe in CI catching every WCAG regression, you should ship that today. AvocadoScore is the report you forward when the conversation is broader than accessibility — performance, SEO, AI visibility, and accessibility in one $29 audit.
What axe DevTools can't tell you
The three findings every AvocadoScore report surfaces that other tools physically can't — because they audit one side of the visibility equation.
Whether GPTBot can read your site
We fetch your homepage twice — once as a browser, once as GPTBot — and compare. Big content drops mean LLMs see a stripped page; CDN bot-detection is the usual culprit.
Whether your llms.txt is actually useful
Presence isn't quality. We validate that your llms.txt has a heading, link count, and sections — the things that make it a real content map for answer engines, not a tickbox file.
Which one fix is the quick win
We rank recommendations by severity × effort and call out true quick wins. You leave with three things to ship Monday, not 47 findings to sort.
Try it on your site — free
60 seconds, no signup. See exactly what you'd get.